top of page

Was John Durham’s Investigation Designed to Fail from the Start?

In a development raising serious concerns among conservative circles, questions are swirling around the integrity and intent of former Special Counsel John Durham’s years-long investigation into the origins of the Russia collusion narrative.

ree

According to a post from investigative media account @LionelMedia on X, a bombshell revelation has emerged: former President Barack Obama allegedly held a meeting on December 8, 2015, where he directed U.S. intelligence agencies to sabotage Donald Trump's candidacy. This explosive claim — if true — would not only reshape the understanding of the 2016 election interference narrative but also suggest a premeditated abuse of federal power at the highest level.


The report questions why John Durham — who spent four years and $10 million investigating the so-called “Russia collusion” hoax — never uncovered or even addressed this 2015 meeting. Was this pivotal meeting missed, overlooked, or intentionally ignored?


Despite years of anticipation, Durham’s investigation led only to one criminal conviction — that of an FBI lawyer who altered an email. No senior officials were held accountable, no systemic conspiracy was formally revealed, and no one from Obama’s inner circle was questioned about this alleged meeting.


Meanwhile, in just six months, political outsider and former Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard reportedly managed to uncover this alleged conspiracy involving Obama and U.S. intelligence. The question now facing the American people is: why couldn’t Durham do the same in four years?


Could it be that Durham was never meant to find it? Was the “investigation” merely a procedural delay — a means of pacifying public outrage without ever threatening the establishment responsible? Was Durham simply “asleep at the wheel,” or was he part of the fix from the start?


The American people deserve answers:

  • Did Barack Obama authorize a covert campaign to interfere in the 2016 election?

  • Why didn’t John Durham investigate this alleged December 2015 meeting?

  • Was the Durham investigation a cover-up, not a true inquiry?

  • What else has been hidden from the public in the name of protecting the deep state?



Comments


Capitol Times magazine Issue 5
Capitol times magazine 9
Capitol times magazine 10

Contact us

Letter to Editor-In-Chief
Editor@capitoltimesmedia.com

For Advertising in
Capitol Times Magazine:

ads@capitoltimesmedia.com

FOLLOW US

  • X
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube

Join our mailing list

Disclaimer:

The views and opinions expressed in the articles or Interviews published in this magazine are solely those of the respective authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Capitol Times magazine or Capitol Times Media , its editors, or its staff. The authors are solely responsible for the content of their articles. The magazine strives to provide a platform for diverse voices and opinions, and we value the principle of free expression. The magazine assumes no responsibility or liability for any errors or omissions in the content of the articles. In no event shall the Capitol Times magazine or Capitol Times Media be liable for any special, direct, indirect, or incidental damages. Furthermore, the inclusion of advertisements or sponsored content in Capitol Times magazine does not constitute an endorsement or guarantee of the products, services, or views promoted by the advertisers. Readers are encouraged to conduct their own research and exercise caution when making decisions based on advertisements or sponsored content featured in this publication.

Thank you for reading and engaging with our publication. Your feedback is valuable to us as we continue to provide a platform for thought-provoking content and diverse perspectives.

© 2025 by Capitol Times Media LLC - Privacy Policy

bottom of page