U.S. Strikes Iran’s Nuclear Facilities, Israel Cheers Trump’s Move
- Anil Anwar
- Jun 22
- 4 min read
On the evening of June 21, 2025, President Donald Trump announced a bold U.S. military operation targeting three Iranian nuclear facilities—Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan. In an X post, Trump declared, “We have completed our very successful attack on the three Nuclear sites in Iran, including Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan. All planes are now outside of Iran air space. A full payload of BOMBS was dropped on the primary site, Fordow. All planes are safely on their way home. Congratulations to our great American Warriors. There is not another military in the World that could have done this. NOW IS THE TIME FOR PEACE!” This decisive action, which utilized up to 30 GBU-57 “bunker buster” bombs and Tomahawk missiles, marked a significant shift in U.S. involvement in the Middle East, directly engaging in a conflict previously led by Israel.

Prior to this operation, the United States had supported Israel’s war effort against Iran through arms sales, intelligence sharing, and the strategic positioning of naval and air assets in the Middle East. The White House had recently issued a two-week ultimatum to Iran, demanding it abandon its nuclear enrichment program in exchange for an end to hostilities. Iran’s defiant refusal to negotiate under attack prompted the U.S. to take direct action, targeting facilities critical to Iran’s nuclear ambitions. This move aligns with longstanding U.S. and Israeli concerns about Iran’s potential to develop nuclear weapons, a threat perceived as existential to Israel’s security.
For many Christians, America’s role as a protector of Israel is rooted in biblical prophecy. Scriptures such as Genesis 12:3—“I will bless those who bless you, and whoever curses you I will curse”—are often cited as evidence of a divine mandate to support Israel. The U.S. strikes on Iran’s nuclear sites could be interpreted as a fulfillment of this role, safeguarding the Holy Land from a formidable adversary. Organizations like Christians United for Israel have long advocated for robust U.S.-Israel cooperation, viewing it as both a strategic alliance and a moral imperative.
However, some within the Christian and Jewishcommunity might question Israel’s reliance on foreign intervention. While the U.S. action demonstrates strength and commitment, it could be argued that Israel, as God’s chosen nation, should exhibit greater self-reliance or trust in divine protection. This perspective, though not universally held, suggests that Israel’s dependence on American military might could signal a lack of faith in its own destiny or divine favor. Such a critique, while maintaining a commitment to Israel’s biblical significance, calls for reflection on how the Jewish state navigates its challenges in the modern era.
The U.S. operation received strong support from key political figures. Speaker of the House Mike Johnson (R-LA) praised President Trump’s decision, stating, “This action demonstrates that the United States will not stand idly by while our friends are threatened.” Even Sen. John Fetterman (D-PA), a Democrat known for his staunch support of Israel, endorsed the strikes, highlighting bipartisan backing among some leaders. In Israel, reactions were overwhelmingly positive, despite the announcement coming at 3:00 a.m. local time. An Israeli-American speaking to Israel’s Army Radio exclaimed, “Thank God we voted for Donald Trump!” reflecting enthusiasm among Trump’s supporters for his foreign policy.
Public opinion, however, reveals a more complex picture. Polling data from Rasmussen Reports, provided exclusively to Breitbart News, indicates that a plurality of Americans support air or naval strikes on Iran’s nuclear sites but oppose the use of ground troops. The data also highlights a partisan divide, with many Democrats opposing both Israel’s initial attacks on Iran and subsequent U.S. involvement. This division underscores the contentious nature of U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East, particularly when it intersects with domestic political alignments.
Group | Support for Air/Naval Strikes | Opposition to Ground Troops | General Stance on U.S. Involvement |
General Public (Plurality) | Supports | Opposes | Mixed, leans toward limited action |
Democrats | Opposes | Strongly Opposes | Largely against U.S. involvement |
Trump Supporters | Strongly Supports | Opposes | Strongly favors U.S. action |
Sen. John Fetterman | Supports | Not Specified | Supports U.S. and Israel’s actions |
Unconfirmed reports suggest the U.S. deployed up to 30 GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrators, known as “bunker buster” bombs, capable of penetrating deeply buried targets like Fordow, Iran’s most fortified nuclear site. Additional reports indicate that six such bombs targeted Fordow, while Tomahawk missiles struck Natanz and Isfahan, sites previously attacked by Israel. The Washington Post notes that Fordow’s heavy reinforcement raises questions about the strikes’ effectiveness, as even these powerful weapons may struggle to destroy such facilities entirely.
Iran’s response has been marked by defiance. Social media posts from Iranian officials and supporters express shock and vow retaliation, signaling potential escalation. This reaction complicates President Trump’s call for peace, as Iran’s leadership appears unwilling to negotiate under military pressure.
From a Christian Conservative perspective, the U.S. strikes are a testament to America’s commitment to Israel’s security, aligning with the belief that nations that stand with Israel will be blessed. However, the reliance on U.S. military power prompts a deeper question: should Israel, as a nation with a divine promise, seek greater independence in confronting its adversaries? While the U.S. action is a powerful demonstration of alliance, some may argue that Israel’s path forward lies in strengthening its own resolve, trusting in both its capabilities and its spiritual heritage.
As the situation unfolds, the world watches closely. The U.S. has taken a bold step, praised by many as a necessary defense of its ally, yet it also highlights the complexities of Israel’s position in the region. For Conservatives, this moment is both a celebration of America’s strength and a call to pray for Israel’s wisdom and resilience in fulfilling its biblical destiny.
Comments