top of page

Twitter Hands Over Extensive Data from Trump's Account to Special Counsel Amid Legal Battle

In a recent turn of events, social media giant Twitter, now operating under the name X, has surrendered a substantial amount of data from former President Donald Trump's account to special counsel Jack Smith. The development came to light as newly unsealed documents shed light on the legal dispute between Twitter and the special counsel's team.





The documents reveal that Twitter provided a comprehensive dataset to Mr. Smith's team, which encompassed deleted direct messages, other direct communications, draft posts, and information about the geographic locations of users who interacted with the account. The company's lawyers disclosed in a closed-door court hearing held on February 9th that the dataset also included what Twitter termed "confidential communications" – messages exchanged between President Trump and his senior advisers.


However, Twitter contested a warrant issued by U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell to hand over the data. Despite the company's challenge, Judge Howell ruled in favor of Mr. Smith, affirming that the special counsel had presented ample evidence to support the warrant and a related non-disclosure order. Twitter's objection against the non-disclosure order was based on claims that it violated the company's constitutional rights.


Despite Twitter's efforts to alert President Trump to the existence of the warrant so he could potentially contest it on the grounds of executive privilege, Judge Howell upheld both the warrant and the non-disclosure order. In response, Twitter appealed the decision to an appeals court. However, the higher court concurred with Judge Howell's ruling, emphasizing that prosecutors had a strong interest in their investigation of Trump and that the order was carefully tailored to specific parameters, including a 180-day duration limit.


The newly revealed transcript also provided insight into the warrant itself, which granted Mr. Smith's team extensive access to Twitter's data. This included all records of composed posts from October 2020 to January 2021, both draft and published; all forms of direct messaging activity; information about devices used to access the account; and any relevant credit card or bank account details. It was clarified that no financial data was associated with the account, as Twitter's services are free.


Furthermore, the warrant required Twitter to furnish lists of users Trump followed and blocked, those who interacted with his posts, and details of searches conducted on the platform within the specified timeframe. While Twitter complied with much of the request, there were ongoing efforts to compile certain records, some of which may have been deleted by an individual with account access after Twitter reinstated it in late 2022. This move followed President Trump's suspension from the platform in 2021 in the aftermath of the U.S. Capitol breach.


Reports indicate that Twitter conveyed to the government that President Trump had to delete certain posts to regain access to his account. Trump, who is currently running for the presidency in the 2024 election, criticized the actions of President Joe Biden's Department of Justice, suggesting they were an attempt to undermine his campaign. He also questioned whether the First Amendment was still upheld.


As legal proceedings continue and discussions around privacy and freedom of expression persist, the case serves as a reminder of the intricate intersection between technology, governance, and individual rights in the digital age.

留言


Top Stories

bottom of page