Trump After Israel’s Strike: Iran’s Time Is Running Out
- David Colbert
- Jun 13
- 5 min read
On June 13, 2025, Israel launched decisive strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities, a bold move that followed the expiration of President Donald Trump's 60-day ultimatum for Iran to negotiate a nuclear deal. In a Truth Social post, Trump declared, "Today is day 61. I told them what to do, but they just couldn’t get there. Now they have, perhaps, a second chance!".
This statement underscores Trump's unwavering commitment to preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons, a stance that aligns with conservative Christian values emphasizing support for Israel and opposition to regimes that threaten global peace. As tensions escalate, it is imperative to stand with Trump and Israel while condemning Iran's dangerous ambitions.

President Trump has consistently prioritized American and allied security in addressing Iran's nuclear threat. His withdrawal from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) in 2018 was a courageous decision, as the deal failed to curb Iran's regional aggression or ensure robust verification of its nuclear activities (Council on Foreign Relations). The Heritage Foundation labeled the JCPOA the "worst deal in history," noting Iran's history of deception, including the 2018 discovery of the Amad archive, which exposed its covert nuclear weapons program.
Trump's recent 60-day ultimatum demonstrated his willingness to pursue diplomacy, offering Iran a chance to dismantle its nuclear program. However, his stern warning that "it will only get worse" for Iran if it fails to comply reflects a strategy of peace through strength. This approach resonates with conservatives who value decisive leadership. Trump's Special Envoy Steve Witkoff has outlined stringent demands, including zero uranium enrichment and the dismantling of Iran's nuclear infrastructure, reinforcing the administration's resolve.
Despite his diplomatic efforts, Trump has faced challenges in aligning with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who favors military action over negotiations. This tension highlights the complexity of the issue, but Trump's commitment to preventing a nuclear Iran remains steadfast, as evidenced by his statement, "Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon. Other than that, I want them to be successful".
Israel's strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities are a necessary response to an existential threat. Iran's leaders have repeatedly vowed to destroy Israel, with former Defense Minister Amir Hatami claiming in 2022 that Israel "has no legitimacy" and is "about to crumble" (Kingston Consortium). Iran's pursuit of nuclear weapons, coupled with its advanced missile program, poses a direct danger to the Jewish state and the broader region.
Israel's actions align with its right to self-defense, a principle supported by many in the U.S., including 77 retired U.S. generals and admirals who urged support for Israeli military action to prevent a nuclear Iran (JINSA). The strikes have already weakened Iran's missile defenses, demonstrating Israel's capability to act decisively. However, reports indicate Israel may plan further strikes, even if Trump secures a deal, reflecting the urgency of the threat.
The U.S.-Israel alliance is rooted in shared democratic values and strategic interests. For conservative Christians, this partnership is also grounded in biblical principles, particularly Genesis 12:3, which states, "I will bless those who bless you, and whoever curses you I will curse." This verse is often cited as a call to support Israel, making Israel's defense against Iran a moral imperative for many believers.
Iran's regime is a global menace, characterized by its support for terrorism, human rights abuses, and nuclear deception. It funds terrorist groups like Hamas and Hezbollah, which have attacked Israel and destabilized the Middle East. Iran's actions against U.S. interests, including the 1983 Marine Barracks bombing that killed 241 Americans and the January 2024 drone strike that killed three U.S. service members in Jordan, underscore its hostility.
Iran's nuclear program, initiated in the 1950s and militarized in the late 1980s, has been marked by consistent deceit. Despite claims of a fatwa against nuclear weapons, Iran is weeks, if not days, from nuclear breakout, with an intercontinental ballistic missile program designed to deliver nuclear warheads. Its refusal to allow robust international inspections and its enrichment of uranium beyond peaceful needs further erode trust.
The regime's oppression of its people, including Christians and other minorities, adds a moral dimension to the issue. Iran's chants of "Death to America" and its threats against Israel reflect an ideology incompatible with peace. A nuclear-armed Iran would embolden its aggression, threatening global stability and security.
For Christians, opposing Iran's nuclear program is not merely a geopolitical necessity but a moral obligation. The Bible calls believers to seek peace while standing against evil. Iran's regime, with its persecution of Christians, support for terrorism, and threats against Israel, represents a clear challenge to these values. The oppression of religious minorities in Iran, including imprisonment and execution of Christians, underscores the regime's hostility to faith communities.
Supporting Israel is a cornerstone of Christian belief, rooted in Genesis 12:3 and other scriptures that affirm God's covenant with the Jewish people. Many Christians see Israel's defense against Iran as a fulfillment of this biblical mandate. The potential for a nuclear Iran to destabilize the region and threaten innocent lives further galvanizes Christian support for decisive action.
The moral imperative extends to preventing nuclear proliferation. A nuclear-armed Iran would not only endanger Israel but also risk catastrophic conflict, undermining the peace that Christians are called to pursue. Trump's efforts to negotiate a deal, backed by the threat of force, align with this dual commitment to peace and justice.
The current situation is complex, with Trump advocating for diplomacy while Israel pushes for military action. Reports indicate Trump has restrained Israel from earlier strikes to pursue negotiations, but he has also warned that strikes could occur if talks fail. This balance reflects the challenge of addressing Iran's threat without triggering a broader conflict.
The evacuation of U.S. personnel from certain Middle East areas signals heightened tensions, underscoring the need for a resolution. A potential deal must include stringent verification measures, zero uranium enrichment, and the dismantling of Iran's nuclear infrastructure to be effective. Without these, any agreement risks repeating the JCPOA's failures.
Israel's military capabilities, demonstrated by its recent strikes, provide leverage in negotiations. The U.S. and Israel could deter Iranian retaliation by targeting critical infrastructure, such as the Kharg Island oil terminal, which handles 90% of Iran's oil exports. This strategic advantage strengthens Trump's position as he seeks a diplomatic resolution.
President Trump's leadership, Israel's defensive actions, and the moral clarity of conservative Christians converge in the fight against Iran's nuclear threat. Iran must seize the second chance offered by Trump and negotiate a verifiable deal to dismantle its nuclear program. Failure to do so risks further devastation, as Trump has warned, with Israel prepared to act decisively.
Christians and Americans are called to support Israel, pray for peace, and stand with leaders like Trump who confront evil with strength and resolve. The stakes are high, but with faith and determination, the U.S. and its allies can prevent a nuclear Iran and secure a safer future for all.
Kommentare