top of page

Arizona Supreme Court Ruled: Legislative tax cuts can't be repealed by voter referendums

According to the Arizona Supreme Court, a referendum backed by organized labor to block an income tax cut worth $2 billion annually violated the state constitution 5–2.


By davidpinter, CC BY 3.0

After overturning a lower court ruling on April 21, the court did not explain why it made its decision.


In the past, state courts ruled that a 2020 referendum to raise taxes on high earners and increase education spending would be struck down by state courts.


Arizona's Constitution allows voters to challenge legislature-approved laws in referendums to prevent them from taking effect. In order to place the issue on the ballot, they must collect the signatures of at least 5 percent of qualified voters.


In contrast, the state constitution prohibits referendums on laws "for the support and maintenance of the departments of the state government." As a result of the fact that the lower court did not appropriate money to fund the tax cut, the Supreme Court of Arizona determined that it was wrong to rule it could proceed to referendum.


Arizona Free Enterprise Club v. Hobbs is the case in which the ruling was rendered. This group's website says it "advocates for free markets and economic growth." Democratic Secretary of State Katie Hobbs is a candidate for Arizona governor in November.


22 August 2022



 
 
 

Comentarios


Contact us

Letter to Editor-In-Chief
Editor@capitoltimesmedia.com

For Advertising in
Capitol Times Magazine:

ads@capitoltimesmedia.com

Capitol Times magazine Issue 5
Capitol times magazine 9
Capitol times magazine 10

Join our mailing list

FOLLOW US

Disclaimer:

The views and opinions expressed in the articles or Interviews published in this magazine are solely those of the respective authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Capitol Times magazine or Capitol Times Media , its editors, or its staff. The authors are solely responsible for the content of their articles. The magazine strives to provide a platform for diverse voices and opinions, and we value the principle of free expression. The magazine assumes no responsibility or liability for any errors or omissions in the content of the articles. In no event shall the Capitol Times magazine or Capitol Times Media be liable for any special, direct, indirect, or incidental damages. Furthermore, the inclusion of advertisements or sponsored content in Capitol Times magazine does not constitute an endorsement or guarantee of the products, services, or views promoted by the advertisers. Readers are encouraged to conduct their own research and exercise caution when making decisions based on advertisements or sponsored content featured in this publication.

Thank you for reading and engaging with our publication. Your feedback is valuable to us as we continue to provide a platform for thought-provoking content and diverse perspectives.

© 2025 by Capitol Times Media LLC - Privacy Policy

  • X
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
bottom of page