top of page

Supreme Court refused to Hear Arizona Election Fraud Challenge

Writer's picture: Capitol TimesCapitol Times


On Monday, the US Supreme Court rejected the appeal by an Arizona resident who tried to prove allegations of voter fraud during his state's November 3 election.


The nine judges, without comment (pdf), rejected a request by Pinal County resident Staci Burk to find evidence of voter fraud. Burk sought access to the ballot papers to prove that some of them were false or fraudulent.


(pdf)


Earlier this year, the Arizona Supreme Court issued a ruling that agreed with a Pinal County District Court judge that Burk had no right to challenge the election. The reason given was that she was not a registered voter at the time she filed her lawsuit, as is required in statewide election contests. The two courts also agreed that it filed a legal challenge too late, after the five-day deadline for filing such a case.



“There is nothing before the Court to indicate that Appellant timely contacted the appropriate authorities to correct any problems with her voter registration,” Arizona Supreme Court Chief Justice Robert Brutinel wrote. “An election challenge … is not the proper vehicle to reinstate voter registration.”

In her petition to the Supreme Court, Burk wanted a hearing over the question about whether she was an “elector.”





May 4, 2021

Mary Hill


Support Honest Journalism


Thanks for reading CTM News and provide accurate news and engaging features, but it will also contribute to the return of American journalism and help protect our freedoms and our republic for future generations. As our operating revenue comes under great pressure, your support can help us carry on the important work we do. If you can, support CTM News by trying it for just $3 – it only takes a minute. Thank you for your support!

Comments


Contact us

Letter to Editor-In-Chief
Editor@capitoltimesmedia.com

For Advertising in
Capitol Times Magazine:

ads@capitoltimesmedia.com

Capitol Times magazine Issue 5
Capitol times magazine 9
Capitol times magazine 10

Join our mailing list

FOLLOW US

  • X
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube

Disclaimer:

The views and opinions expressed in the articles or Interviews published in this magazine are solely those of the respective authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Capitol Times magazine or Capitol Times Media , its editors, or its staff. The authors are solely responsible for the content of their articles. The magazine strives to provide a platform for diverse voices and opinions, and we value the principle of free expression. The magazine assumes no responsibility or liability for any errors or omissions in the content of the articles. In no event shall the Capitol Times magazine or Capitol Times Media be liable for any special, direct, indirect, or incidental damages. Furthermore, the inclusion of advertisements or sponsored content in Capitol Times magazine does not constitute an endorsement or guarantee of the products, services, or views promoted by the advertisers. Readers are encouraged to conduct their own research and exercise caution when making decisions based on advertisements or sponsored content featured in this publication.

Thank you for reading and engaging with our publication. Your feedback is valuable to us as we continue to provide a platform for thought-provoking content and diverse perspectives.

© 2024 by Capitol Times Media LLC - Privacy Policy

bottom of page