top of page

Trump to World: America Won’t Use Force—But Greenland Belongs in America’s Strategic Future

DAVOS, Switzerland — In a speech that shook the World Economic Forum to its core, President Donald J. Trump delivered one of the most unapologetically pro-American addresses in decades — and once again made clear that the United States rightfully claims strategic priority over Greenland.


Standing before the global elite in Davos, Trump reaffirmed his long-standing call for the U.S. to assume control of Greenland, the vast Arctic territory currently tethered to Denmark — a call rooted not in empty bravado, but in cold geopolitical calculus and the absolute primacy of American security interests.


“I don’t want to use force, I won’t use force,” the president declared, setting aside alarmist narratives from Europe’s capitals. But he didn’t walk back one essential truth: Greenland is part of the North American strategic sphere, and no power — European or otherwise — is capable of securing it better than the United States.


A Call for Negotiated Sovereignty — Strength, Not Weakness

Trump’s announcement that the U.S. won’t resort to military force was no retreat — it was a strategic olive branch after decades of European dependence. For too long, Washington has shouldered global defense burdens while allies like Denmark, France, and Germany falter in Arctic readiness. At Davos, Trump made it clear: America still leads, and it leads with strength first — diplomacy backed by undeniable capability.


Trump didn’t mince words about past American generosity. Recalling U.S. defense of Greenland in World War II and the subsequent return of the territory, the president asked bluntly: “How stupid were we to do that?” — a rhetorical punch this ragged world sorely needed.

This is not about conquest — it’s about American guardianship. It’s about ensuring that the heartland of the Western Hemisphere can never be leveraged against us by foreign powers. It’s about reclaiming strategic advantage in a world where rivals like Russia and China are creeping ever closer to the Arctic Circle.


NATO and the False Patriotism of European Elites

Trump didn’t just address Greenland — he systematically exposed the hypocrisy of NATO elites who expect the U.S. to defend the free world while refusing to acknowledge America’s rightful role in securing its own geostrategic backyard. Questioning the alliance’s mutual defense commitments, Trump provoked Europe not with needless hostility — but with truth.


For years, European leaders have criticized American leadership while benefiting from American might. Now, under Trump’s direction, that dynamic is being challenged — and the backlash has been swift. While some Paris and Brussels bureaucrats label Trump’s stance “aggressive,” ordinary Americans see it for what it is: common sense.


A Vision for America First — Diplomacy With Teeth

The president called for “immediate negotiations” with Denmark and Greenlandic leaders — a clear signal that he prefers strategic deals to military adventurism. But make no mistake: this administration understands that power underpins peace.


In the same speech, Trump tied Greenland to broader defense initiatives, including the proposed


Golden Dome Arctic missile defense plan — a system that, by design, requires secure access to Arctic territory to defend the homeland from emerging threats.


What’s Next?

Europe’s elite may recoil, but this isn’t about pleasing Davos consensus or Paris salons. This is about putting America first — in security, in strategy, and in sovereignty. Trump’s message was clear: the world will either negotiate with a strong United States or watch it proceed on its own terms.


And make no mistake — the era of passive American geopolitics is over.



Capitol Times magazine Issue 5
Capitol times magazine 9
Capitol times magazine 10

Contact us

Letter to Editor-In-Chief
Editor@capitoltimesmedia.com

For Advertising in
Capitol Times Magazine:

ads@capitoltimesmedia.com

FOLLOW US

  • X
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube

Join our mailing list

Disclaimer:

The views and opinions expressed in the articles or Interviews published in this magazine are solely those of the respective authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Capitol Times magazine or Capitol Times Media , its editors, or its staff. The authors are solely responsible for the content of their articles. The magazine strives to provide a platform for diverse voices and opinions, and we value the principle of free expression. The magazine assumes no responsibility or liability for any errors or omissions in the content of the articles. In no event shall the Capitol Times magazine or Capitol Times Media be liable for any special, direct, indirect, or incidental damages. Furthermore, the inclusion of advertisements or sponsored content in Capitol Times magazine does not constitute an endorsement or guarantee of the products, services, or views promoted by the advertisers. Readers are encouraged to conduct their own research and exercise caution when making decisions based on advertisements or sponsored content featured in this publication.

Thank you for reading and engaging with our publication. Your feedback is valuable to us as we continue to provide a platform for thought-provoking content and diverse perspectives.

© 2025 by Capitol Times Media LLC - Privacy Policy

bottom of page