top of page

A bill limiting objection to presidential results advances in the Senate


ree
Photo Credit: Gage Skidmore

After Sen. Mitch McConnell expressed support for the measure, the Senate recently voted in favor of reforming the Electoral Count Act of 1887.


As a result of a 14–1 vote on Sept. 27, the Senate Rules Committee approved the Electoral Count Reform and Presidential Transition Improvement Act of 2022 and sent the bill to the Senate floor. Senators Susan Collins (R-Maine) and Joe Manchin (D-West Virginia) wrote the bill.


The Senate bill was supported by 14 senators, including McConnell.

“I’ll proudly support the legislation provided that nothing more than practical changes are made to its current form,” McConnell said in remarks to the Senate. He added that the bill as introduced “is the only chance to get an outcome and to actually make law.”


“Congress’s process for counting the presidential electors’ votes was written 135 years ago,” he said. “The chaos that came to a head on January 6th of last year certainly underscored the need for an update. So did Januaries 2001, 2005, and 2017; in each of which, Democrats tried to challenge the lawful election of a Republican president.”


Senator Ted Cruz voted no on the Senate Rules Committee.

“This bill is a bad bill. … It’s bad policy and it’s bad for democracy. There are serious constitutional questions in the bill,” Cruz said in the Senate. “The text of the Constitution, Article Two says, ‘Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors.’ This bill is Congress trying to intrude on the authority of the state legislatures to do that. But it’s also exceptionally bad policy.”


ree
Photo Credit: Gage Skidmore

“We know that Democrats aren’t opposed to objecting to elections and presidential electors. We know that because Democrats objected in 1969. And then they objected again in 2001. Then they objected again in 2005. And then they objected again in 2017. So Democrats have a long history of going up and objecting to electors,” he said.



28 September 2022

 
 
 

Comments


Capitol Times magazine Issue 5
Capitol times magazine 9
Capitol times magazine 10

Contact us

Letter to Editor-In-Chief
Editor@capitoltimesmedia.com

For Advertising in
Capitol Times Magazine:

ads@capitoltimesmedia.com

FOLLOW US

  • X
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube

Join our mailing list

Disclaimer:

The views and opinions expressed in the articles or Interviews published in this magazine are solely those of the respective authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Capitol Times magazine or Capitol Times Media , its editors, or its staff. The authors are solely responsible for the content of their articles. The magazine strives to provide a platform for diverse voices and opinions, and we value the principle of free expression. The magazine assumes no responsibility or liability for any errors or omissions in the content of the articles. In no event shall the Capitol Times magazine or Capitol Times Media be liable for any special, direct, indirect, or incidental damages. Furthermore, the inclusion of advertisements or sponsored content in Capitol Times magazine does not constitute an endorsement or guarantee of the products, services, or views promoted by the advertisers. Readers are encouraged to conduct their own research and exercise caution when making decisions based on advertisements or sponsored content featured in this publication.

Thank you for reading and engaging with our publication. Your feedback is valuable to us as we continue to provide a platform for thought-provoking content and diverse perspectives.

© 2025 by Capitol Times Media LLC - Privacy Policy

bottom of page